Cutting the Pentagon's Budget Is a Gift to Our Enemies A Debate /

Political gridlock in Washington triggered across-the-board spending cuts, known as the sequester, in March 2013. As a result, the Pentagon had to eliminate $41 billion from its budget. In 2011, the United States spent $711 billion dollars on defense-more than the next 13 countries combined. Could t...

Full description

Other Authors: Infobase., Intelligence Squared.
Format: Video
Language: English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Intelligence Squared, [2013]
Distributed by Infobase,
Physical Description: 1 streaming video file (100 min.) : sound, color.
Subjects:
Table of Contents:
  • Introduction: Intelligence Squared U.S. (5:06)
  • Debate "Housekeeping" (7:07)
  • For the Motion: Andrew Krepinevich (5:55)
  • Against the Motion: Benjamin Friedman (6:35)
  • For the Motion: Thomas Donnelly (5:21)
  • Against the Motion: Kori Schake (6:36)
  • Summary of Arguments (1:30)
  • QA: Do You Advocate Goal of Global Domination? (2:54)
  • QA: Is Efficiency a Solution? (3:43)
  • QA: Military Spending and Strategy (6:33)
  • QA: What Are Our Enemies' Goals? (10:38)
  • QA: Should We Reallocate Money or Cut the Deficit? (2:12)
  • QA: Ways to Save Money (1:35)
  • QA: Can We Move the Military's Mission Toward Diplomacy? (7:14)
  • QA: Inefficient Military Procurement (1:25)
  • QA: Can the U.S. Remain Militarily Strong With Weak Economy? (3:05)
  • QA: Maintaining Technical Dominance (2:02)
  • Closing Statement Against: Kori Schake (3:10)
  • Closing Statement For: Thomas Donnelly (2:05)
  • Closing Statement Against: Benjamin Friedman (2:09)
  • Closing Statement For: Andrew Krepinevich (2:17)
  • Time to Vote (4:12)
  • Vote Results (1:11)
  • Credits: Cutting the Pentagon's Budget Is a Gift to Our Enemies (1:16)