Loading…

The morality of embryo use

Is it permissible to use a human embryo in stem cell research, or in general as a means for the benefit of others? Acknowledging each embryo as an object of moral concern, Louis M.Guenin argues that it is morally permissible to decline intrauterine transfer of an embryo formed outside the body, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Guenin, Louis M., 1950-
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Cambridge, UK ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Physical Description:
x, 273 pages ; 24 cm.
Subjects:
Online Access:Contributor biographical information -

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 ocn191891594
003 OCoLC
005 20100607034813.0
008 080321s2008 enk b 001 0 eng
010 |a 2008013429 
015 |a GBA863680  |2 bnb 
016 7 |a 101469467  |2 DNLM 
016 7 |a 014607145  |2 Uk 
020 |a 9780521872690  |q hardback 
020 |a 0521872693  |q hardback 
020 |a 9780521694278  |q paperback 
020 |a 0521694272  |q paperback 
024 8 |a 40015868129 
035 |a (OCoLC)191891594 
040 |a DNLM/DLC  |b eng  |c DLC  |d NLM  |d YDXCP  |d BAKER  |d BTCTA  |d UKM  |d BWKUK  |d BWK  |d CDX  |d BWX  |d YUS  |d XXH  |d KEC  |d IG#  |d TSU  |d OMB  |d U9S  |d TEX  |d CRH  |d UBY  |d CHVBK  |d W2U  |d COM 
042 |a pcc 
049 |a COMA 
050 0 0 |a BJ1469  |b .G84 2008 
060 0 0 |a 2008 K-200 
060 1 0 |a QS 620  |b G926m 2008 
082 0 0 |a 174.2/8  |2 22 
082 0 4 |a 174.29602774  |2 22 
100 1 |a Guenin, Louis M.,  |d 1950-  |0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2008181316. 
245 1 4 |a The morality of embryo use /  |c Louis M. Guenin. 
264 1 |a Cambridge, UK ;  |a New York :  |b Cambridge University Press,  |c 2008. 
300 |a x, 273 pages ;  |c 24 cm. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 259-268) and index. 
505 0 |a Preface -- 1. Preliminaries -- 1.1. Embryo use -- 1.2. The biological context -- 1.3. Affected beings and utilitarianism -- 1.4. A computational Waterloo -- 2. Epidosembryos -- 2.1. The universe of concern -- 2.2. The set of eligible subjects -- 2.3. The argument from nonenablement -- (a) Developmental potential and discretionary action -- (b) Permissibility of declining intrauterine transfer -- (c) Collective redistribution indefensible -- (d) No possible person corresponds to an epidosembryo -- (e) Epidosembryo personhood untenable -- (f) Fulfilling the collective duty of beneficence -- 2.4. Other defenses of embryo use distinguished -- 2.5. Two subsets, one justification -- 2.6. Replies to objections relating to potential -- 2.7. In service of humanitarian ends -- 3. Individuation -- 3.1. The ontological challenge -- 3.2. Identity -- 3.3. Understanding individuation -- 3.4. Arguments against early embryonic individuality -- (a) Demanding indivisibility -- (b) Embryo splitting and personal identity -- (c) Totipotency of blastomere components -- 3.5. Divisibility and personhood -- 3.6. Individuality further considered -- (a) Individuality within alternative ontologies -- (b) Categories and kinds of creatures -- (c) The embryo as organism -- (d) Other resources -- 3.7. Where matters remain -- 4. Respect for specific life -- 4.1. The species problem -- 4.2. Species as universals -- 4.3. Species as structures -- 4.4. Properties -- (a) Kripke's causal theory of reference -- (b) Putnam's theory of reference -- (c) Homeostatic property cluster natural kinds -- (d) Essentialism for species-corresponding kinds -- 4.5. Taxa -- 4.6. Bearers of morally crucial properties -- 4.7. Species partiality -- 4.8. Inferences within theistic ethics -- 5. Consensus -- 5.1. Public reason -- 5.2. Kantian morality -- 5.3. The Catholic magisterium -- (a) Two doctrines -- (b) The first nineteen centuries -- (c) Assertion of immediate animation -- (d) Prescinding from the timing of animation -- 5.4. Arguments concerning personhood -- (a) From genome to person -- (b) Lack of a nonarbitrary beginning -- (c) Possibility of a soul -- 5.5. Support for epidosembryo use -- (a) The social duties -- (b) Inferring divine will -- (c) Charity and assisted reproduction -- (d) Escape from a dilemma -- (e) Protecting a related stance -- 5.6. Recognizing common ground -- 6. Clones -- 6.1. Nonreprocloning -- 6.2. The teleological objection -- 6.3. Reprocloning -- (a) Hazards -- (b) Nonsafety objections -- (c) Considering probable incidence -- (d) Assessing the objections -- (e) Prohibition and privacy -- 6.4. Strategic prohibition of nonreprocloning -- 7. Analyzing alternatives -- 7.1. Putative noncomplicity -- 7.2. Studying the developed human -- 7.3. Procuring pluripotent cells -- 7.4. Parthenotes -- 8. Shaping norms -- 8.1. Gifts and consents -- 8.2. Public support -- 8.3. Oocyte contributions -- 8.4. Ectogenesis -- 8.5. Hybrids and chimeras -- 8.6. Pleonexia and patents -- Bibliography -- Index. 
520 |a Is it permissible to use a human embryo in stem cell research, or in general as a means for the benefit of others? Acknowledging each embryo as an object of moral concern, Louis M.Guenin argues that it is morally permissible to decline intrauterine transfer of an embryo formed outside the body, and that from this permission and the duty of beneficence, there follows a consensus justification for using donated embryos in service of humanitarian ends. He then proceeds to show how this justification commands assent even within moral and religious views commonly thought to oppose embryo use. Beneath his moral reasoning lies a carefully constructed metaphysical foundation incorporating accounts of the ontology of development, embryos, and species. He also incisively discusses nonreprocloning, reprocloning, ectogenesis, and related scientific frontiers. This compelling philosophical study will interest all concerned to understand virtue and obligation in the relief of suffering. 
650 0 |a Life and death, Power over.  |0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85076811. 
650 0 |a Fetus  |x Research  |0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85047978  |x Moral and ethical aspects.  |0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh00006099. 
650 0 |a Human embryo  |0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85062864  |x Therapeutic use  |0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2001008985  |x Moral and ethical aspects.  |0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh00006099. 
650 1 2 |a Embryo Research  |x ethics.  |0 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D033041Q000941. 
650 1 2 |a Embryo Disposition  |x ethics.  |0 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D019924Q000941. 
650 2 2 |a Embryonic Stem Cells.  |0 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D053595. 
650 2 2 |a Embryo Transfer  |x ethics.  |0 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D004624Q000941. 
650 2 2 |a Personhood.  |0 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D028723. 
650 2 2 |a Cloning, Organism  |x ethics.  |0 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D019976Q000941. 
650 6 |a Pouvoir sur la vie et la mort. 
650 6 |a Embryon humain  |x Recherche  |x Aspect moral. 
650 6 |a Embryon humain  |x Emploi en thérapeutique  |x Aspect moral. 
650 7 |a Ethik  |x Embryo.  |2 idsbb. 
650 7 |a Embryo  |x Ethik.  |2 idsbb. 
650 7 |a Embryonenschutz.  |2 idsbb. 
907 |a .b29952992  |b cu   |c -  |d 100607  |e 230523 
998 |a cu  |b 100607  |c m  |d a   |e -  |f eng  |g enk  |h 4  |i 0 
948 |a MARCIVE Comp, in 2022.12 
948 |a MARCIVE August, 2017 
948 |a MARCIVE extract Aug 5, 2017 
994 |a C0  |b COM 
995 |a Loaded with m2btab.ltiac in 2022.12 
995 |a Loaded with m2btab.ltiac in 2017.08 
995 |a Exported from Connexion by CMU 
989 |a BJ1469  |r .G84 2008  |d culmb  |b 1080005640051  |e 05-04-2015 12:06  |f  - -   |g -   |h 6  |i 5  |j 18  |k 100607  |l $0.00  |m    |n 05-06-2015 15:42  |o -  |p 371  |q 371  |t 0  |x 0  |1 .i57476822  |3 Contributor biographical information  |u http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0827/2008013429-b.html  |3 Publisher description  |u http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0827/2008013429-d.html  |3 Table of contents only  |u http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0827/2008013429-t.html